We work in your repo, under your name, and we do not talk to your client.

You won the pitch. Now you need the hands.

It is a good problem and it is still a problem. A client says yes to something bigger than the team you have available this quarter. Hiring takes months and commits you to a salary long after this project ends. Turning it down means watching a client take the work, and possibly the rest of their budget, somewhere else.

The obvious answer is a subcontractor, and the reason agencies hesitate is that subcontracting has a bad history. The partner misses the deadline and it is your client who is angry. The code arrives undocumented, and your team inherits something they cannot maintain. Or, worst of all, six months later your client mentions in passing that the developer reached out to them directly.

Those three failures are the entire reason this page exists. Below is exactly how we prevent each one, written down so you can hold us to it.

Four things we take on

All of it under your brand, in your repository, to your standards.

Four commitments, in writing

These are not aspirations. They are the terms.

Scope in, work out, no drama

01

You send the scope, we send a fixed number

Usually within two working days. If the scope has holes in it, and scopes written to win a pitch often do, we will flag them before quoting rather than discovering them mid-build and issuing a change request.

02

We work to your timeline, into your stack

Your repo, your staging environment, your deployment process. Progress visible where your team already looks, so you can answer your client's Wednesday-morning question without having to ask us first.

03

You review before your client does

Nothing goes to your client without you seeing it. If it needs another pass, it gets another pass, the version they see should be the version you are happy to have your name on.

04

We hand over and step back

Documented, in your repository, in your hosting. If you never need us again, everything still works. That is the whole test of whether a white label partner was actually any good.

On being invisible

There is no case study on this site naming an agency partner. There never will be, because the entire value of a white label relationship is that it is not advertised. If we ever ask to write one up, the answer can be no and it will not affect anything.

It does mean we cannot prove this with logos. What we can do is give you a small first project, at a price where the risk is low, and let the work make the argument. That is how every agency relationship we have started, actually started.

Partnership, answered plainly

Yes, as a matter of routine. We work under your brand and we expect to be invisible. If you want a non-solicitation clause covering your clients as well, we will sign that too, we are not building a business on poaching from partners.

Send a scope. Get a fixed number in two days.

Start with something small. If we are good, you will know quickly, and if we are not, you will have risked very little finding out.